Subject | Re: Eric will argue about everything, for days (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging) |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 07/26/2014 02:32 (07/26/2014 12:32) |
Message-ID | <nnt5t9db1o0ngtov68v2q32tb20m9b61jb@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (7h & 5m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanWell, you haven't dealt with it yet. You haven't even tried. --
In article <nf94t95mdlp1s6kkp4ga3d45tg2f4vl5a0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanEric StevensSandmanHere we have Eric again and again posting about nospam having denied something even though nospam has said over and over again that he forgot about this.Eric Stevens
Listen Dumb-brain
The height of Eric's argumentation skills, ad hominem's.
Can't you deal with the Hall-effect switch?
Sorry, Eric, I didn't read any of your post past the above quoted material. You lost the "argument" flat out without evebvn trying when you started out with that. There was nothing you had to say that had anything to do with what I posted when it starts like that. You're a fourteen year old boy trapped in an 80 year old body.
Right. You can't deal with the Hall effect switch.
Keep telling yourself that, Eric.