Subject | Re: grammar was: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
From | Byter |
Date | 07/12/2014 00:55 (07/11/2014 17:55) |
Message-ID | <mtOdnUST9p_l9l3OnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Savageduck |
SavageduckAttitude, shmattitude ...
On 2014-07-11 18:10:39 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>said:On 7/11/14 PDT, 11:01 AM, Savageduck wrote:Let us just say it is the word which best describes what others might think of my attitude of late.On 2014-07-11 17:48:44 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>said:On 7/10/14 PDT, 2:43 PM, Savageduck wrote:Possibly, but it's stilted!So? My use of "effected" is appropriate.The reality was the Cloud services were down for about 18 hours, and at no time did subscribers lose access to the CC Apps. It certainly effected those who were dependent on CC services for collaborative work and online publishing, however, what happened was not catastrophic.Wouldn't bring this up except the very word was discussed recently: s/b "affected"
There were always other means of delivering/sharing or collaborating while the CC services were down, DB, or Box for example. Particularly since the CC apps never stopped running.
Let's go back and discuss "curmudgeonly"! :)
-- Regards,
Savageduck