| >to choose. I asked the cheapest prices for each. $2,200 for
| >the Mac. $500 for the eMachines.
|
| is price all that matters to you?
|
Only an AppleSeed could ask such a silly question.
The Mac was more than 4 times more expensive. Actually,
the first computer I used was a Mac. My neighbor at the
time let me onto his AOL account. At that time everyone
was talking about the Internet and getting email. I wanted
to see what it was all about. I used the Mac for several
months just to go online.
At the time -- 1998 -- Macs still had better displays. But
I wasn't working as a graphic artist. I didn't even have any
idea what the difference was between the two. So spending
an extra $1,700 for the Mac would have needed to give me
more than just better display; like maybe a free car or a
washer/dryer/frig combo.
In the end I was glad of my choice. I'm a tinkerer and
Windows is great for tinkering. I can write my own software
fairly easily on Windows. I can build my own computers. Apple
has always held a tight rein on both hardware and software
development. As Lord Jobs put it so succinctly to his
spaceship/office architect in telling him he didn't want any
windows that open, Jobs "had never liked the idea of people
being able to open things. 'That would just allow people to
screw things up.' "
I love that quote. It's the Steve Jobs arrogance, control
compulsion and design insight all in one sentence.
|
| >Somewhere around that time, I don't remember when, MS
| >actually bailed out Apple, just to keep the appearance of
| >competition.
|
| microsoft has never bailed out apple. that is a *myth*.
|
| what *actually* happened was that microsoft stole apple's code for
| quicktime.
|
| apple and microsoft both knew it, so instead of going to court and
| losing, microsoft settled out of court and part of the settlement was a
| $150 million stock purchase and cross-licensing patents and other
| intellectual property.
The facts online don't support your claim. As usual, you don't
provide any corroboration for your claims. Anyone who
cares to look into it can search for: microsoft bailed out apple
The first few links I got were CNN, Wired, etc. They offered
a number of explanations for the deal, but I didn't see anything
about QuickTime. Apple did agree, as part of the deal, to drop
a suit over GUI but it was commonly known that Apple was
desperate for money at the time.