Skip to main content
news

Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ?

Eric Stevens
Google Google
SubjectRe: Adobe's Low hanging .... ?
FromEric Stevens
Date07/15/2014 03:13 (07/15/2014 13:13)
Message-ID<vfv8s9516jf75ugsknatnnr6ifc4fl8fot@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (40m) > Eric Stevens
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:46:37 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <rpo8s9hah4noecapg956of03ra7poes2a5@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

if you were paying *any* attention at all to this thread, or even the post to which you replied to here, you'd realize that the entire point is that the cloud is *not* the sole repository for data.

Eric Stevens
In some cases there is. There are many ill-advised people of the smart-phone brigade who believe that the cloud is a safe place to keep all their messages, images and videos that have overflowed from their phone.

nospam
that's no different than having only one copy on a hard drive.

it has nothing to do with the cloud.

Yet there are people who have absolute faith in the cloud. You did not help when you said "a cloud outage might be annoying, but the data won't be lost". This can be interpreted as meaning that even if the cloud goes down the data will still be there when it comes back up. Well, it might be be but there is no guarantee that it will be.

one copy is *always* a risk no matter where it is, cloud, local or offsite.

Which is not what you implied when you wrote "a cloud outage might be annoying, but the data won't be lost". ... data won't be lost. ... data won't be lost. ... data won't be lost. ... data won't be lost. ... data won't be lost. Oh yeah?

--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Google
nospam (40m) > Eric Stevens