Subject | Re: Eric will argue about everything, for days (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 08/09/2014 10:22 (08/09/2014 10:22) |
Message-ID | <slrnlubn07.qub.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 1m) > Sandman |
Eric StevensEric StevensSandman
Read above: I've been complaining about it for some time. Keep up wwith this surreptitious snipping if you want to. It doesn't bother me. I've got a macro to restore it.
You're so much of a troll that you have a macro set up to edit the quoted material of the posts you're responding to? That's pretty amazing commitment to being a complete asshole!
I have to ask what kind of person is it who thinks that restoring unaltered the relevant original text is the action of a troll?
Could it be that it is the action of a person why wishes to imply by the nature of his response that the original text said something other than it did? No, it could hardly be that, could it?"action of a person why wishes"? Not sure what you're trying to say here.