Google| Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 07/17/2014 19:24 (07/17/2014 13:24) |
| Message-ID | <170720141324379492%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
In article <lq8t8h04it@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:
wrong. unlike you, i have ethics and do *not* take what i want.PeterNnospamPeterNPeterNSandman
The phone is kaput. The data on the phone is lost
No, the threshold to access has been greatly elevated. It can be done, but since you have a backup and your data hasn't been lost, it is not worth it for you to access the data.
If your phone, and your phone only, contained the launch codes to US missile bases, and an "internal switch" made the phone "kaput", then the data would not be considered lost, and would be retrieved by a number of different data retrieval processes.
As it is, your data wasn't valuable enough for you to retrieve the data, since you had a backup and your data wasn't actually lost.
All agreed.
i'll take that as an admission that you admit to being wrong.
You always take what you want.
You are wrong.there you go contradicting yourself again.
you just agreed with sandman, who agrees with me, so if you say i'm wrong and he's not, then it's a contradiction.
you're so full of shit it's not even funny.
they have *nothing* to do with data loss.PeterNMy comment was made in response to a statement that the iPhone has no moving parts. It obviously does.nospam
none of which matter to data loss and anyone with any clue knows that.
you only mentioned buttons/switches because you want to argue for the sake of argument.
And buttons and switches on an iPhone are not moving parts.
you only brought those up because you have nothing better to do than nitpick details to argue, and in the process, demonstrate what a colossal idiot you are (and that's a description of fact, not an insult).
07/10/2014-
