Google| Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 07/17/2014 19:24 (07/17/2014 13:24) |
| Message-ID | <170720141324359381%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
In article <lq8sah043p@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:
i didn't lie and you definitely contradict yourself, quite frequently in fact, mainly because you haven't any idea what you're talking about.PeterNnospam
Although the data on any device may be there,
so you admit it's there!you're a world of contradictions.PeterN
You state a lie and then accuse me of contradicting myself?
you argue just to argue and in some cases, argue against yourself, as you did in another post.
nope.PeterNit's worthless if it cannot be accessed.nospam
it can, but since you have a backup, which you said you did, then it doesn't matter if it can or not.
Yet, another statement taken out of context.
The issue was data loss.yes it was and still is.
Not backup.backups are required to avoid data loss.
You only brought up backup when shown to be wrong on the loss issue.nope. backups are required to avoid data loss. everyone (except you) knows that.
Not reasonably available = loss.wrong on that too, and you even agreed that it's wrong.
amazing how not only do you contradict yourself but you haven't any clue what you're even saying.
07/10/2014-
