Google| Subject | Eric will argue about everything, for days (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 07/24/2014 10:43 (07/24/2014 10:43) |
| Message-ID | <slrnlt1i4r.4o8.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (54m) > Sandman |
In article <dsc0t9t4b0sngoojiu56kpsojdmhte13r2@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
Here we have Eric again and again posting about nospam having denied something even though nospam has said over and over again that he forgot about this. Eric will respond time and time again arguing that nospam was wrong while ignoring that nospam has acknowledged this over a day ago.nospamnospam
which did not exist on your 4s, so it's not even relevant.once again, you're arguing just to argue.furthermore, the presence of the magnetic switches that eric is talking about reinforces what i originally said. the magnetic reed switches are an example of internal switches, contrasted with the other buttons and switches which are external.Eric Stevens
According to you, there are no such switches.
i said i forgot about the magnetic switches.however, those switches *are* internal, whereas the others are not.Eric Stevens
That there were internal switches in the iPad is what you denied.
But that's not the end of the fun - Eric is making a huge deal about the supposed magnetic switch in the iPad. Only, it's not a switch at all. It's a magnetic sensor. Ooops.
-- Sandman[.net]
07/10/2014-
