Skip to main content
news

Re: Eric will argue about e...

Sandman
SubjectRe: Eric will argue about everything, for days (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging)
FromSandman
Date07/26/2014 09:38 (07/26/2014 09:38)
Message-ID<slrnlt6n4d.bpt.mr@irc.sandman.net>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsEric Stevens
FollowupsEric Stevens (1h & 26m) > Sandman

In article <nnt5t9db1o0ngtov68v2q32tb20m9b61jb@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Sandman
Here we have Eric again and again posting about nospam having denied something even though nospam has said over and over again that he forgot about this.

Eric Stevens
Listen Dumb-brain

Sandman
The height of Eric's argumentation skills, ad hominem's.

Eric Stevens
Can't you deal with the Hall-effect switch?

Sandman
Sorry, Eric, I didn't read any of your post past the above quoted material. You lost the "argument" flat out without evebvn trying when you started out with that. There was nothing you had to say that had anything to do with what I posted when it starts like that. You're a fourteen year old boy trapped in an 80 year old body.

Eric Stevens
Right. You can't deal with the Hall effect switch.

Sandman
Keep telling yourself that, Eric.

Eric Stevens
Well, you haven't dealt with it yet. You haven't even tried.

Stop trolling like a teenager, and perhaps you will be treated like you were something resembling an adult.

-- Sandman[.net]

Eric Stevens (1h & 26m) > Sandman