Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
From | PeterN |
Date | 07/15/2014 18:30 (07/15/2014 12:30) |
Message-ID | <lq3ksi0feu@news1.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | nospam (33m) > PeterN Sandman (17h & 44m) > PeterN |
Eric StevensFunny. The problem with my old iPhone was a broken internal switch. The phone would turn on and off, but nothing could be accessed. According t the good folks at the Apple store the diagnostic code was a bad internal switch, or something like that. It cold not be repaired. Perhaps I should have sent nospam to argue with them.
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:53:49 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamEric Stevens
In article <lq1tgl01q83@news3.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:nospamPeterNEric Stevensnospam
I was pointing out that there are unique risks associated with phones and that they are less secure storage for data than laptops.
the only risk is for theft.
otherwise, they're *more* secure since there are no moving parts to fail.
Which model of any smart phone has no moving parts?
all of them.
buttons and switches do not count since those do not store data and even if one fails, the data is intact.
you really have no clue, do you?
You really have difficulty in expressing what you mean. You previously wrote "a cloud outage might be annoying, but the data won't be lost" when you really meant a cloud outage might be annoying, but the data won't be lost as it should be stored in a copy else where.
Now you say smartphones are "*more* secure since there are no moving parts to fail" when you really meant smartphones are *more* secure since there are no moving parts to fail except buttons and switches which do not store data.
Are you really saying that it is not possible for the failure of a button or switch to cause the loss of data? You will have to be very brave to say that: just because you don't know or can't think of an example doesn't mean it can't happen.
-- PeterNEric StevensnospamnospamPeterN
they're also smaller and easier to hide.
And lose.
no.
Haw. Who believes that?