Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 07/15/2014 11:12 (07/15/2014 21:12) |
Message-ID | <4gr9s9pf5iboqhkeangn78v41ccun5qb99@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (6h & 1m) > Eric Stevens PeterN (7h & 17m) |
nospamYou really have difficulty in expressing what you mean. You previously wrote "a cloud outage might be annoying, but the data won't be lost" when you really meant a cloud outage might be annoying, but the data won't be lost as it should be stored in a copy else where.
In article <lq1tgl01q83@news3.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:nospamPeterNEric Stevensnospam
I was pointing out that there are unique risks associated with phones and that they are less secure storage for data than laptops.
the only risk is for theft.
otherwise, they're *more* secure since there are no moving parts to fail.
Which model of any smart phone has no moving parts?
all of them.
buttons and switches do not count since those do not store data and even if one fails, the data is intact.
you really have no clue, do you?
Haw. Who believes that? --nospamthey're also smaller and easier to hide.PeterN
And lose.
no.