Skip to main content
news

Re: Eric will argue about e...

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Eric will argue about everything, for days (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging)
FromEric Stevens
Date07/25/2014 11:40 (07/25/2014 21:40)
Message-ID<nf94t95mdlp1s6kkp4ga3d45tg2f4vl5a0@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (16m) > Eric Stevens

On 25 Jul 2014 06:08:46 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <ug43t9pl2h5s2bad79huldsu3fpri6racd@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Here we have Eric again and again posting about nospam having denied something even though nospam has said over and over again that he forgot about this.

Eric Stevens
Listen Dumb-brain

Sandman
The height of Eric's argumentation skills, ad hominem's.

Eric Stevens
Can't you deal with the Hall-effect switch?

Sandman
Sorry, Eric, I didn't read any of your post past the above quoted material. You lost the "argument" flat out without evebvn trying when you started out with that. There was nothing you had to say that had anything to do with what I posted when it starts like that. You're a fourteen year old boy trapped in an 80 year old body.

Right. You can't deal with the Hall effect switch. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens