Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 07/22/2014 11:48 (07/22/2014 21:48) |
Message-ID | <dpcss9tea93qarnvdc4vj3teqj7hah22nh@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (12m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanWhere are we in disagreement?
In article <jjvqs9ht58056h5cuqdp38l4vpsqvlnum3@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensEric Stevens
I thought it all started when you posted on 16 Jul 2014 10:14:52 GMT in Message-ID: <slrnlsckg6.pkj.mr@irc.sandman.net>:"What "switch" was this? You say it's an internal component, and the topic was "moving parts" so you seem to imply that inside your iPhone there was a mechanical physically moving "switch" that was broken. Having seen the insides of many iPhones (I have a friend that repair them), I can assure you that no such switch exists."Sandman
Of course not, given the fact that I was not the first one to talk about an internal switch. That was Peter.
Agreed, but you were the first person to deny that there was a switch.
No, I was the one that correctly pointed out that there exists no such swicth, as a reply to Peter's claim of such a switch.
So your socks, too, are external to your shoes. --SandmanEric StevensEric StevensSandman
The context in this case was your statement " Having seen the insides of many iPhones (I have a friend that repair them), I can assure you that no such switch exists." My link above shows that your remark was incorrect.
No it doesn't. Your link shows one of the external switches. In fact, it shows the only switch in the entire phone, which is external.
You have a most peculiar definition of 'external'.
Well, my definition is in line with the one found in the dictionary. If you think that's "peculiar", then what can I say...