Google| Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
| From | PeterN |
| Date | 07/19/2014 21:58 (07/19/2014 15:58) |
| Message-ID | <lqeik40luv@news4.newsguy.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | nospam (1h & 7m) > PeterN Sandman (10h & 57m) > PeterN |
On 7/18/2014 1:07 AM, Sandman wrote:
Sandman<snip>
In article <lq8r3k03ej@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN wrote:
As a former editor and professor, I would qualify as an expert in contemporary English usage in most courts. The concept is really simple: If important context is missing from a quote, which context gives meaning to the original statement, the quote can be considered as taken out of c9ntext. [end of English lesson.]PeterNSandman
You are proficient enough with research to understand the academic meaning of "peer reviewed."
True, I was making a joke. I made it to point out that the meaning and definition of expressions aren't peer reviewed. I mean, it's not like you pointed me to a "peer reviewed" definition of "taken out of context" that disagrees with wikipedia.
-- PeterN
07/10/2014-
