Google| Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 07/23/2014 23:06 (07/24/2014 09:06) |
| Message-ID | <0m80t996vt4c91vtlf6kebon31vt4qv1u1@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (3h & 10m) |
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:29:57 -0400, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:
Tony CooperI wasn't referring to Sandman's spelling but to the absence of the word 'completely'. He had written:
On 23 Jul 2014 07:47:36 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:Eric StevensSandman
You shoull add the word 'completely' to your English vocabulary.
As well as the word "shoull"?Still doing his darnest to ignore that he was wrong and would rather die than admit his error.Tony Cooper
In another group in which I participate, the term "Skitt's Law" is used to identify the situation in which a person corrects another person's spelling error...and makes a spelling error in the same post.
"If it was mounted inside the phone, it would not be accessible from the outside."
I was implying he should have written:
"If it was mounted inside the phone, it would not be *completely* accessible from the outside".
... which it isn't.
I've just posted this for clarification.
--
Regards,
Eric Stevens
07/10/2014-
