Subject | Re: iPad power supply unit (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 08/02/2014 09:19 (08/02/2014 09:19) |
Message-ID | <slrnltp4l6.uom.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 44m) > Sandman |
Eric Stevens
You think semantics is about word meanings. Well, it isn't. Look it up.
1. "You think semantics is about word meanings. Well, it isn't" 2. "You can't have semantics without word meanings"Right. It's all of that. That's why I say it is not just a matter of word meanings.Sandman
Quite the opposite. You said, still quoted above, that it *ISN'T* about word meanings, totally excluding the concept of word meanings from the definition of semantics.Will you admit to your error? Probably not.Eric Stevens
It's about word meanings the same way that electronics is about Kirchhoff's law. You can't have semantics without word meanings and you can't have electronics without Kirchhoff's law. But that doesn't mean that semantics is about word meanings or electronics is about Kirchhoff's law.