Google| Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
| From | Whisky-dave |
| Date | 07/25/2014 18:16 (07/25/2014 09:16) |
| Message-ID | <40329815-ff18-4025-b57c-947c76b34a17@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | nospam (3h & 3m) > Whisky-dave |
On Wednesday, 23 July 2014 17:11:14 UTC+1, nospam wrote:
nospamI greee but they are more expensive and then do you buy SLC, MLC, or TLC
In article <d4962e2e-922d-480d-8379-e1d473800bb6@googlegroups.com>, Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>wrote:nospamWhisky-daveWhisky-daveWhisky-davenospam
way only changed. The DATA IS NOT lost in the real world.
data is definitely lost in the real world.
How ? Explain the process.nospamnospamWhisky-dave
it's very simple. someone tries to access a document and it fails for any of a number of reasons, including hard drive failure.
Well I thought you were refering to SSD or flash media in phones or computers
doesn't matter.
But you don;t get head crashes with SSDs,
exactly, which is why an ssd is much more reliable.
no moving parts.I assume you agree that you should still back then up and that it doesn't have to be to SSD.
I doubt the cloud is entirley made up of SSDs, there's a reason for that. I'm really not sure which would be the most *relible* a SSD of around 512Gb or spending that amount of cash on 512Gb HDDs and keeping clones as backups
07/10/2014-
