Google| Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 07/22/2014 18:14 (07/22/2014 12:14) |
| Message-ID | <220720141214475747%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Rikishi42 (9d, 4h & 42m) > nospam |
In article <h9bss9tobo3p0gh35ja72sa17al6v33gef@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
whose fault is that?Eric StevensnospamEric StevensSandmanPeterNWhisky-dave
This all started when you sat iPhones have no moving parts.
Next he'll be saying they have no mecanical parts.
They don't, since the topic was data loss - smart phones have no mechanical parts in relation to their data storage.
That's a considerable retreat from your original claim. Very wise.
nonsense. it's not a retreat at all.
this discussion has *always* been about data loss.
Except when people diverted from the subject of the original thread.
the answer is those who diverted.
the subject has always been the same.
it wasn't so much forgetting what they said. it was arguing over moving parts when it was clearly obvious that a button or switch (which does move) has *nothing* to do with data loss. he is arguing just to argue. it's what he does. he made a lifelong career out of doing that.nospamEric Stevens
peter was trying to confuse the issue by bringing up irrelevant details just to argue, because that's all he knows how to do.
Well, he was paraphrasing what he could recall of what he was told by Apple.
07/10/2014-
