Skip to main content
news

Re: grammar was: Adobe's Lo...

Savageduck
SubjectRe: grammar was: Adobe's Low hanging .... ?
FromSavageduck
Date07/11/2014 20:01 (07/11/2014 11:01)
Message-ID<201407111101553510-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsJohn McWilliams
FollowupsJohn McWilliams (8m) > Savageduck

On 2014-07-11 17:48:44 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>said:

John McWilliams
On 7/10/14 PDT, 2:43 PM, Savageduck wrote:

Savageduck
On 2014-07-10 21:15:39 +0000, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>sai

John McWilliams
d:

Eric Stevens
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/06/19/adobe_creative_cloud_2014_comm

John McWilliams
ent/

Eric Stevens
"one Adobe evangelist at the recent CC pre-launch press briefing suggested that it was the usersÂ’ own fault for logging out o

John McWilliams
f

Eric Stevens
their Adobe IDs when they experienced sign-in issues instead of following a convoluted workaround that no-one except Adobe knew about."

I wonder who that was?

Savageduck
What gets me about the Register and its reporting is just how anti-Apple, & anti-Adobe they are.

They are forever making less than factual statements, in the case of this particular article they have expanded their claim for the CC outag

John McWilliams
e

Savageduck
from about 24 hours, to more than 24 hours, to the "some 36 hours" in this report. The reality was the Cloud services were down for about 18 hours, and at

no time did subscribers lose access to the CC Apps. It certainly effected those who were dependent on CC services for collaborative work

and online publishing, however, what happened was not catastrophic.

There were always other means of delivering/sharing or collaborating while the CC services were down, DB, or Box for example. Particularly since the CC apps never stopped running.

John McWilliams
Wouldn't bring this up except the very word was discussed recently: s/b "affected"

So? My use of "effected" is appropriate.

-- Regards,

Savageduck