Google| Subject | Re: Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was(Re: Lenses and sharpening) |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 10/06/2014 23:27 (10/07/2014 10:27) |
| Message-ID | <f8063at26v6f058q2k4eb6riov4mkisimv@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Alan Browne |
| Followups | Alan Browne (15m) > Eric Stevens Martin Brown (10h & 17m) > Eric Stevens nospam (23h & 59m) |
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 22:37:46 -0400, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>wrote:
Alan BrowneBut hang on: we do accept a certain degree of quality loss as part of the normal process of editing. It doesn't take much manipulation to turn a smooth histogram into something like http://pe-images.s3.amazonaws.com/basics/adjustment-layers/fix-white.gif Push things a bit harder and you can get http://www.snoopy.me.uk/misc/365project/histogram/comb3.jpg or even https://aperture64.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/combing.gif
On 2014.10.05, 20:55 , PeterN wrote:PeterNAlan Browne
On 10/5/2014 6:57 PM, Alan Browne wrote:Alan BrownePeterN
On 2014.10.05, 14:42 , PeterN wrote:We went through all this some many months ago. I demonstrated clearly that the amount of 'loss' was negligible in practical terms.PeterNAlan Browne
I would use the terem "color change." anstead of loss.
Any change is a quality loss. Whether that is colour difference, tone, brightness, sharpness ... whatever, it's a loss.
Then you are using a different definition of quality.
Not at all. A non lossy process would have:
RGB-A -->X-format -->RGB-B
with RGB-A identical to RGB-B
But - the fact is that with Lab
RGB-A -->Lab -->RGB-B
RGB-A =/= RGB-B, therefore there was quality loss.
The production of histograms like the first one is common and generally acceptable. The second histogram is worse but even then may be acceptable. Only the last one is so bad that it will nearly always be unacceptable. The point of all this is that some degree of quality loss is virtually inevitable as soon as you start to manipulate an image.
In the context of the present discussion, the question is, does the conversion to Lab colour incur any more damage than one can expect in the course of ordinary editing? My understanding of nospam's claim is that it does. My (admittedly limited) experience with it suggests that conversion to Lab causes no significant damage; certainly less than I am going to inflict on the image by the changes I want to make.
As to the extent of the damage, I can only refer to my original experiment described in Message-ID: <uuou2atgm5l6j5rn9d47jk7mn8s927cpdk@4ax.com>
------------------------------------------
This one continues to bother me. I am still inclined to agree with Dan Margulis. I'm not quite sure what procedure Andrew Rodney is proposing to prove his point so, using Photoshop CC, I have carried out my own test as follows:
1. Find a JPG with a suitable range of colors. This one came from my wife's collection: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31088803/Lab%20test%20IMG_2154.jpg I saved a copy as a PSD (see below for the reason).
2. Copy and convert to Lab. I couldn't save to JPG from Lab so I saved to PSD. See https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31088803/Lab%20test%20IMG_2154-via-Lab.jpg
3. I then loaded the two PSD files into a new file as separate layers. (1) above was the background layer and (2) was the next. I subtracted the 2nd layer from the first with the result shown in https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31088803/Lab%20test%20Difference.jpg That's right: solid black.
4. To confirm the point I took a screen shot. See https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31088803/Lab%20test%20Screen.jpg Note the histogram. All of the pixels appear to be down at the zero end of the scale: that is, jet black.
The only conclusion I can reach is that there is no difference between a PSD created from a RGB file and a PSD created from the same image when it has first been converted from RGB to Lab.
I'm not wedded to the perfection of the method I have used and I would be interested to hear from anyone who has a meaningful criticism.
--------------------------------
and my later comments in Message-ID: <2gav2atofpmjbalmsv41bkbovlvc6p8s0i@4ax.com>
======================= I've just compared the original JPG with a copy -->Lab -->JPG again. JPGs are RGB are they not? Anyway I still got an apparently all-black screen and here is the screen shot showing the histogram: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31088803/Lab%20test%20screen%202.jpg
An even tighter all-black bar than previously.
============================ The histogram of the JPG(RBG) --->Lab --->PSD when compared with JPG(RBG) --->PSD shows only very slight evidence of differences between the two.
However JPG(RBG) --->Lab --->JPG(RBG) appears to be identical to the original JPG(RBG).
So far I don't think I have found any evidence of damage worth worrying about. --
Regards,
Eric Stevens
09/13/2014-
