Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/18/2014 11:17 (09/18/2014 21:17) |
Message-ID | <kl8l1al9qunsl20cug0o1ghgjbbu0b6ncb@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (5h & 53m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanWhy don't you go away and ask someone technically qualified about the meaning of not just 'reversible', but 'reversible process'? You might learn something in your turn. --
In article <psjk1apg1qvs66hku8ri8cmv3sl308ksc7@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmannospamSavageduckEric Stevens
If you make the adjustments in Photoshop with a non-destructive workflow there is no use of sidecar files or catalog entries as in Lightroom.
True, but this has nothing to do with whether a process is reversible or not.
if it can be reversed, then it's reversible.since you finally agree that adjustments made in photoshop can be reversed, then it's reversible.Eric Stevens
I don't know of any operations in Photoshop which are reversible in the strict sense that Floyd was using the term.
All of them are reversible, in every sense of the term.Eric StevensSandman
Some aaspects of smart objects might be, but I don't know enough about them yet to venture an opinion.
We know you don't. That's why we are educating you guys about what can be done with modern software.