Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 09/21/2014 07:34 (09/20/2014 22:34) |
Message-ID | <2014092022343426392-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (3h & 41m) |
Eric StevensI knew that word was going to show up sooner or later. ;-)
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:58:12 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamEric Stevens
In article <8oes1ap1h8kjpoc18oghp2jjtpphorv9iu@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensnospamEric StevensSavageduckEric Stevensnospam
"Maximum entropy method in image processing".
Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.
Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. <http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html>
And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding".
that has absolutely nothing to do with a non-destructive workflow and whether something is reversible.
Which is why your contributions to this thread have been meaningless noise.
you have that backwards.
anything other than a non-destructive workflow is noise.
that includes thermodynamics, physics, entropy, flat earth and whatever else was mentioned.
Ignoramus!