Subject | Re: Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was(Re: Lenses and sharpening) |
From | nospam |
Date | 10/13/2014 22:41 (10/13/2014 16:41) |
Message-ID | <131020141641106953%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | PeterN |
Followups | PeterN (23m) |
i did not ignore anything.PeterNnospamPeterNPeterNnospam
The fact is that very little can be done in any plug-in that can't be done in PS.
completely false.
if that were the case, then there would be no need for plug-ins.
Bad logic. Some plug-ins allow for faster processing. Also, do learn to read, I said nothing about speeding up workflow.
take your own advice, do learn to read. i didn't say anything about speeding up workflow at all.
Never said you did. Indeed, your commengt totally ignored that potential
at least you admit you know nothing about lab.PeterNnospamPeterNAlmost anything can be done in both RGB & LAB. LAB is a lot easie, and faster for some processes.nospam
very few and not without a cost.
You just don't know how to use lAB, and won't admit that.
i've forgotten more about lab that you'll ever know.
YOur comments about LAB do support your statement.
nobody said you had to use one.PeterNnospamPeterNthat gives more flexability, which is a good thing. Getting into a tool war, is meaningless, unless there is a reasonable accurate description of what eah plug-in does.nospam
Habing said that, I am annoyed that the oil paint filter was removed from CC 2014.
third party opportunity.
Yup
then why are you annoyed?
I do not see a rational reason why I should have to use one. I had eliminated Painter from my workflow, and missed the upgrade window.