Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Ron C |
| Date | 09/20/2014 02:37 (09/19/2014 20:37) |
| Message-ID | <r4mdnZEgr-2rUYHJnZ2dnUU7-eudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Floyd L. Davidson (16m) > Ron C Eric Stevens (2h & 56m) PeterN (23h & 35m) |
On 9/19/2014 3:08 AM, Sandman wrote:
SandmanThough I've only followed this news group a few months I seem to have noticed a trend of all threads asymptotically approaching a zero SNR, though I guess it depends a lot on how one defines S and N. Seems the entropy increases with each post. [YMMV]
In article <874mw4vmry.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:nospam
In article <fe7l1a9qgalhhov3a460vmrue9jfa0lq9k@4ax.com>, Eric StevensFloyd L. DavidsonEric Stevensnospam
Floyd's usage is strictly in accordance with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_process_%28thermodynamics%29 as it applies information theory. If you think there is no room for reversible processes in information theory see http://tinyurl.com/otp5pug
since when does editing digital images on a computer become a thermodynamics problem?
Since Claude Shannon published "A Mathematical Theory of Communications".Look it up. Wonderful paper...Sandman
Yes, this is the level of idiocy one can expect from Floyd - he thinks that image processing became a thermodynamic problem at a point in time when someone published some information. Before that - not related. After that, totally related.
Yeah, hilarious, I know.
=L... RC --
09/13/2014-
