Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 09/19/2014 21:02 (09/19/2014 21:02) |
| Message-ID | <slrnm1ovu7.d9b.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Floyd L. Davidson |
| Followups | Savageduck (18m) Floyd L. Davidson (1h) > Sandman |
In article <87vbojttf4.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
Now Floyd thinks the DPI information saved for an image file is in any way related to the physical PPI of the screen. Isn't he adorable?nospam
In article <bc792678-99f5-4416-8002-0d75afbeadf2@googlegroups.com>,Floyd L. DavidsonWhisky-davenospam
Do you happen to know whether or not this preview file is a copy of the original file but 'rendered' at 72DPI rather than the final copy which is mostly likely to be 300+ DPI for printing ?
there is no dpi or more accurately ppi until you print. everything is always done to the original image.
Until you print... or display an image on a monitor screen. Same thing, and a different value for DPI/PPI.
-- Sandman[.net]
09/13/2014-
