Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Eric Stevens
Google Google
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromEric Stevens
Date09/22/2014 00:18 (09/22/2014 10:18)
Message-ID<l6ju1ap2gt4oarggc5a0jh0n8irdeml5li@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsFloyd L. Davidson (45m)
Sandman (9h & 10m) > Eric Stevens
On 21 Sep 2014 10:56:18 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <us2s1a14rnlk1rohuamnv022kivfbtp19k@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
No, quite correct. See, for example: http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e

Sandman
Again, thermodynamics have nothing to do with image processing.

Eric Stevens
A *lot* of people don't agree with you.

Sandman
Incorrect.

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html

http://www.johnloomis.org/ece563/notes/basics/entropy/entropy.html "In the case of an image ... "

http://brainacle.com/calculating-image-entropy-with-python-how-and-why.html

http://www.esrf.eu/computing/Forum/imgCIF/PAPER/entropy.html

http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles0808/ip0808-1.html

You can carry on from there.

You're flailing, Eric.

Eric Stevens
And you are way out of your depth.

Sandman
Ironic.

Like an anchor. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Google
Floyd L. Davidson (45m)
Sandman (9h & 10m) > Eric Stevens