Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/21/2014 04:43 (09/21/2014 14:43) |
Message-ID | <8oes1ap1h8kjpoc18oghp2jjtpphorv9iu@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (15m) > Eric Stevens |
nospamWhich is why your contributions to this thread have been meaningless noise. --
In article <bkas1a9pi3ps8d9b00f8f8f2611mktjkng@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensSavageduckEric Stevensnospam
"Maximum entropy method in image processing".
Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.
Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. <http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html>
And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding".
that has absolutely nothing to do with a non-destructive workflow and whether something is reversible.