Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/20/2014 05:51 (09/19/2014 23:51) |
| Message-ID | <190920142351480660%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 9m) |
In article <lhsp1atceq8is7jjri2s52jqukk40abvng@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
certainly not that.Eric StevensEric Stevensnospam
When I (and Floyd) say 'fully reversible' we are using a very specific meaning.
and everyone else is using a different meaning, one which both of you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge.
Good Lord. What on earth do you think I have been doing!
Floyd used a very specific meaning the significance of which you have been ignoring from the outset.nope. i didn't ignore it at all.
You have insisted in trying to force on him an entirely different meaning which, if accepted, would have him saying something entirely different.also false.
But you have turned your face away from what he was trying to say ...nope.
if there's anyone who has turned their faces it's you and floyd.
09/13/2014-
