Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/18/2014 23:59 (09/19/2014 09:59) |
Message-ID | <jdlm1a184r1mtgrei211j2depsbin7q1uj@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (9h & 5m) |
SandmanWrong definition.
In article <pr7l1atblusnl5v5rf8ogipdu6jci0nujk@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanSavageduckEric Stevens
HPS might well be reversible, but returning the file to its truly original state after being saved as a JPEG is improbable.
It's not the file that is being returned to the original state: it's the sharpening.
Which is impossible in Floyd's ignorant example, where the file was compressed with JPG between the two steps, making the HPS irreversible.SandmanSavageduckEric Stevens
However, I have the tools to do that, with HSP, and even USM regardless of how much you stamp your feet and say I can't.
But you are not reversing it
Yes, he is.Eric StevensSandman
you are reverting
"Reverting" and "Reversing" are synonyms in this scenario. Both words going back to a previous state.
Hmph! --Eric StevensSandman
and replacing it.
Nothing is being replaced. Only reversed/reverted to its original state, just like the word(s) mean.
You trolls - argue for days on end about the meaning of words you do not understand.