Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 09/19/2014 07:04 (09/18/2014 22:04) |
Message-ID | <2014091822041145406-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Eric StevensWhat are you guys smoking down there in New Zealand? ...it can't possibly be the same shit found in Alaska, but if it is that might explain something.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:55:27 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamEric Stevens
In article <ld4n1a1cmj32ak5ua8fl5s515112u8ljh7@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensEric Stevensnospam
As nospam has so often told us, Lightroom (and other software using side car files) do not actually change the file being edited until it is in the process of being exported. In most case, all you see on the screen is a simplified simulacrum of what the edited file will look like, when the editing instructions are executed.
Once you export the file - that's it. You cannot reverse the changes. All you can do is edit the original all over again but this time slightly differently.
which means the changes are reversible.
You are not reversing the changes: you are substituting for them. Surely even you can see that?
you're overanalyzing things again.
the user makes a change to an image and quits the app. the next day
All they have done up to this point is create a list of edits and view a simulacrum of their effect in screen. They haven't actually edited the image.nospamEric Stevens
they resume working on the image and decide to reverse what they did the day before.
So they change the list of edits and againview the changed simulacrum which results. They haven't actually created any image to be changed at either point. That oonly happens once they execute the list of edits by exporting the image.nospamEric Stevens
with a non-destructive workflow, they can do that. without a non-destructive workflow, the changes cannot be reversed.
Once they have executed the list of edits by exporting a file the changes can't generally be reversed either.nospamEric Stevens
the key here is the workflow.nospamEric StevensEric Stevensnospam
Now it's interesting that Lightroom does incorporate something a little bit like the reversible process that Floyd was talking about but neither nospam or Savageduck seem to realise the fact. See http://tinyurl.com/p5sus42 From blur to sharpness on the one slider. But this is not actually a reversible process: it's a change in the instruction to the final edit which will only be executed when the image is exported.
not only do i realize it but that's what i've been saying all along.
you are *so* confused.
And I have pointed out that you cannot reverse a change which has not actually been made. Even if it is reversible, you can't reverse something before you have done it.
the change *has* been made, just not to the pixels themselves.
And to what has the change been made?nospamEric Stevens
as i said, you're confused.
I'm confused?