Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Floyd L. Davidson
Google Google
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromFloyd L. Davidson
Date09/20/2014 06:45 (09/19/2014 20:45)
Message-ID<87vboirjb7.fld@barrow.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsEric Stevens
Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Eric Stevens
On 19 Sep 2014 07:07:26 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <9qjm1a565i5llji39v4234h0dm0oqd0k9s@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
Floyd's usage is strictly in accordance with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_process_%28thermodynamics%29 as it applies information theory. If you think there is no room for reversible processes in information theory see http://tinyurl.com/otp5pug

nospam
since when does editing digital images on a computer become a thermodynamics problem?

Sandman
Since half past never.

Eric Stevens
Wrong.

Sandman
I.e. correct.

Eric Stevens
See my reply to nospam.

Sandman
Nothing in your reply makes image processing be the same as thermodynamics, Eric. You're blathering about things you know nothing about.

Eric Stevens
See http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e

For an awful long time I've been citing "Entropy and Art" (1971) by Rudolf Arnheim as an essential essay regarding composition in photography.

www.kenb.ca/z-aakkozzll/pdf/arnheim.pdf

I doubt that Sandman or nospam (Savageduck either) can digest that.

-- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com