Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/20/2014 16:56 (09/20/2014 10:56) |
| Message-ID | <200920141056484999%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (1h & 18m) |
In article <slrnm1qq8b.hiv.mr@irc.sandman.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
no they're not.SandmannospamSandman
previews are for a responsive user interface.
Of course.nospamnospamSandman
they are not required as part of a non-destructive workflow.
They are, however, required in Lightroom's workflow, which is non-destructive.
they are not required at all.
They are.
a non-destructive workflow will work without them, but it will be slow (hello aperture 1.0).
it can be used non-destructively but it's not a parametric editor.SandmannospamnospamSandman
photoshop is a pixel editor but can be used in a non-destructive manner. that doesn't make it a parametric editor.
Using it as I described above makes it one, yes.
no it doesn't. photoshop is not a parametric editor.
Parametric image editing is a class of non-destructive image editing where the editing software does not alter original files. Photoshop can be used in exactly this manner, and you know it.
When used this way - using smart filters and adjustment layers, Photoshop *IS* a parametric image editor.no
09/13/2014-
