Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Floyd L. Davidson |
Date | 09/22/2014 01:04 (09/21/2014 15:04) |
Message-ID | <877g0wr2xb.fld@barrow.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Sandman (8h & 26m) |
Eric StevensEric I am impressed to put it mildly. You've laid Sandman's evasions, trolling, lies, and distortions to *total* waste in a way that can't be ignored by anyone with two functioning brain cells.
On 21 Sep 2014 10:56:18 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:Eric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
Again, thermodynamics have nothing to do with image processing.
A *lot* of people don't agree with you.
Incorrect.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html
http://www.johnloomis.org/ece563/notes/basics/entropy/entropy.html"In the case of an image ... "
http://brainacle.com/calculating-image-entropy-with-python-how-and-why.html
http://www.esrf.eu/computing/Forum/imgCIF/PAPER/entropy.html
http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles0808/ip0808-1.html
You can carry on from there.Eric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
You're flailing, Eric.
And you are way out of your depth.
Ironic.
Like an anchor.