Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/18/2014 07:19 (09/18/2014 01:19) |
| Message-ID | <180920140119094550%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Floyd L. Davidson (1h & 56m) > nospam Eric Stevens (3h & 48m) |
In article <lbqk1adl3p9v8m9gj7jen4cbmlum8a7k2f@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
i used the common meaning of the term reversible.Eric StevensnospamEric StevensSandmanSavageduckEric Stevens
If you make the adjustments in Photoshop with a non-destructive workflow there is no use of sidecar files or catalog entries as in Lightroom.
True, but this has nothing to do with whether a process is reversible or not.
Of course it does. Non-destructive adjustments means they are reversible.
Not in the strictly technical sense in which Floyd was using the term.
that's the whole problem.
floyd cannot acknowledge that there are other completely valid meanings.
If you want to argue with what he said then you have to use the same meaning that he did.
he is using his own narrow definition and intentionally dismissing *anything* else.
09/13/2014-
