Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 09/18/2014 10:37 (09/18/2014 10:37) |
| Message-ID | <slrnm1l6u1.881.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (40m) > Sandman |
In article <psjk1apg1qvs66hku8ri8cmv3sl308ksc7@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
All of them are reversible, in every sense of the term.nospamSavageduckEric Stevens
If you make the adjustments in Photoshop with a non-destructive workflow there is no use of sidecar files or catalog entries as in Lightroom.
True, but this has nothing to do with whether a process is reversible or not.
if it can be reversed, then it's reversible.since you finally agree that adjustments made in photoshop can be reversed, then it's reversible.Eric Stevens
I don't know of any operations in Photoshop which are reversible in the strict sense that Floyd was using the term.
Some aaspects of smart objects might be, but I don't know enough about them yet to venture an opinion.We know you don't. That's why we are educating you guys about what can be done with modern software.
-- Sandman[.net]
09/13/2014-
