Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Floyd L. Davidson |
Date | 09/16/2014 18:38 (09/16/2014 08:38) |
Message-ID | <878uljzfkd.fld@barrow.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (3h & 58m) |
nospamBut a non-destructive workflow is not a "reversible workflow".
In article <87lhpjzwb6.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:nospamSavageduckFloyd L. Davidson
So? The fact still remains, regardless of personal opinion about Adobe, Lightroom, & Photoshop, those using that software have the ability to maintain a fully non-destructive, and reversible workflow, that includes reversing the effects of any filter including USM.
It's not a "reversible" workflow. The correct terms would be either a non-linear undo, or simply that it can be reverted.
the correct term and the one used by everyone except you is a non-destructible workflow.