Google| Subject | Re: Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was(Re: Lenses and sharpening) |
| From | PeterN |
| Date | 10/06/2014 15:22 (10/06/2014 09:22) |
| Message-ID | <m0u52p02ei@news1.newsguy.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | nospam (1d, 8h & 3m) |
On 10/6/2014 4:31 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
Eric StevensHe just likes to argue. Even, when as pointed out earlier, it's against his own argument.
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:05:19 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamEric Stevens
In article <m0sgku32i4g@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:nospamPeterNPeterNnospam
I gaae him some common uses. He typically uses "edge case' to give him wriggle room.
wrong again.
what i call an edge case is an edge case and what you're calling common can be done *without* lab more easily and with better quality results.
in other words, you're blaming others for your own lack of knowledge and unwillingness to learn.
Well then explain with facts and detail. Warning. I have Dan's book and will use it as a reference.
that's your problem. dan is wrong and reading his books has led you astray.
if you read other books, you'll see that they consistently prove just how much of an idiot dan really is. i've mentioned two such books in this thread and other books in other threads.
You seem to have a thing about Lab color. Your comments are quite unbalanced. You don't seem to have a good comment about *any* aspect of it. What happened to you?
-- PeterN
09/13/2014-
