Savageduck
On 2014-09-21 05:13:46 +0000, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>said:

Eric Stevens
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:58:12 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <8oes1ap1h8kjpoc18oghp2jjtpphorv9iu@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Eric Stevens
"Maximum entropy method in image processing".

Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.

nospam
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.

Savageduck
Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. <http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html>

Eric Stevens
And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding".

nospam
that has absolutely nothing to do with a non-destructive workflow and whether something is reversible.

Eric Stevens
Which is why your contributions to this thread have been meaningless noise.

nospam
you have that backwards.

anything other than a non-destructive workflow is noise.

that includes thermodynamics, physics, entropy, flat earth and whatever else was mentioned.

Eric Stevens
Ignoramus!

Savageduck
I knew that word was going to show up sooner or later. ;-)