Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/21/2014 21:07 (09/21/2014 15:07) |
| Message-ID | <210920141507227954%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
In article <8vms1a12q5b8mqs8hqrl6mdtjptggsoukj@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
i didn't contradict anyone.Eric StevensSavageduckEric StevensSavageduckEric StevensnospamnospamEric Stevens
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.
I'm sure they do.
so you finally agree it's reversible. amazing.
I've never denied it. It's just that it's not fully reversible in the strict sense that Floyd used it.
Floyd is using Lightroom & Photoshop? Amazing!!! Hell, or is it Barrow (that is more likely) has frozen over.
You really do have a problem looking directly at what I have been saying.
What I am saying is, this tread has become very silly with all sorts of folks disagreeing, and talking at cross purposes.
Right from the point when nospam started contradicting Floyd.
09/13/2014-
