Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | nospam |
Date | 09/16/2014 22:36 (09/16/2014 16:36) |
Message-ID | <160920141636390846%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Floyd L. Davidson |
Followups | PeterN (1h & 15m) > nospam |
it can be.Floyd L. DavidsonnospamSavageduckFloyd L. Davidson
So? The fact still remains, regardless of personal opinion about Adobe, Lightroom, & Photoshop, those using that software have the ability to maintain a fully non-destructive, and reversible workflow, that includes reversing the effects of any filter including USM.
It's not a "reversible" workflow. The correct terms would be either a non-linear undo, or simply that it can be reverted.
the correct term and the one used by everyone except you is a non-destructible workflow.
But a non-destructive workflow is not a "reversible workflow".
Which doesn't make any difference anyway, as the topic is sharpening algorithms, not editor workflow design.topics drift. deal with it.