Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

nospam
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
Fromnospam
Date09/16/2014 22:36 (09/16/2014 16:36)
Message-ID<160920141636390846%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsFloyd L. Davidson
FollowupsPeterN (1h & 15m) > nospam

In article <878uljzfkd.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:

Savageduck
So? The fact still remains, regardless of personal opinion about Adobe, Lightroom, & Photoshop, those using that software have the ability to maintain a fully non-destructive, and reversible workflow, that includes reversing the effects of any filter including USM.

Floyd L. Davidson
It's not a "reversible" workflow. The correct terms would be either a non-linear undo, or simply that it can be reverted.

nospam
the correct term and the one used by everyone except you is a non-destructible workflow.

Floyd L. Davidson
But a non-destructive workflow is not a "reversible workflow".

it can be.

Which doesn't make any difference anyway, as the topic is sharpening algorithms, not editor workflow design.

topics drift. deal with it.

PeterN (1h & 15m) > nospam