Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | PeterN |
Date | 09/18/2014 19:59 (09/18/2014 13:59) |
Message-ID | <lvf6j8016no@news3.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (18m) > PeterN Savageduck (2h & 25m) |
nospamA documented demonstration would support your position. Since you don't want to use what is allegedly your image, everybody here has my prmission to play with the crappy image I posted. Indeed I am placing it in th epublic domain solely for purposes of expirimentation. Now either prove your point, or STFU.
In article <mckk1a1d5rh7uidfs53gru2sovpl6k7f2g@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric Stevensnospamto put it another way, i can change the amount of unsharp mask on an image i processed a year ago, without having to redo *anything* else i did. all of the retouching, white balance, etc. remain the same (unless i choose to adjust those too).Eric Stevens
But you can't do that once the image has been exported.
nonsense, of course i can, and have.
But not to the exported image,
so what?
the fact is i can change anything without needing to redo the entire process.
floyd said the entire process would need to be redone. he's wrong.Eric Stevensnospam
not with the original sidecar file.
there is no sidecar file.