Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | PeterN |
Date | 09/16/2014 23:52 (09/16/2014 17:52) |
Message-ID | <lvabda01js@news4.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (4m) |
nospamLearn the difference between a natural drift, and a deliberate drift to avoid a proper response to the issue. We all know yo never do that.
In article <878uljzfkd.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:nospamFloyd L. DavidsonnospamSavageduckFloyd L. Davidson
So? The fact still remains, regardless of personal opinion about Adobe, Lightroom, & Photoshop, those using that software have the ability to maintain a fully non-destructive, and reversible workflow, that includes reversing the effects of any filter including USM.
It's not a "reversible" workflow. The correct terms would be either a non-linear undo, or simply that it can be reverted.
the correct term and the one used by everyone except you is a non-destructible workflow.
But a non-destructive workflow is not a "reversible workflow".
it can be.Floyd L. Davidsonnospam
Which doesn't make any difference anyway, as the topic is sharpening algorithms, not editor workflow design.
topics drift. deal with it.