Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromEric Stevens
Date09/19/2014 00:26 (09/19/2014 10:26)
Message-ID<mtmm1athqh2oaeti59euriqqfcurbqaieh@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (8h & 40m)

On 18 Sep 2014 15:10:33 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <bg8l1a97jt385u28t6d063kdfqmjtdch24@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
Not in the strictly technical sense in which Floyd was using the term.

Sandman
Yes, in a very strictly technical sense. In every sense of the word.

Eric Stevens
I disagree with you.

Sandman
Your agreement isn't necessary for facts to be true.

Eric Stevens
Floyd disagrees with you.

Sandman
Floyd will disagree with anything factual.

Eric Stevens
Leaving out the question of native language, what experience or training have you had to qualify you to dispute Floyd and my use of the term "reversible process"?

Sandman
Since you have been spouting irrelevant nonsense about thermodynamics, and Floyd thinks JPG compression is reversible, I am not interested in either of your incorrect views of the term. I am telling you what the correct usage and definition means when it pertains to the current topic - image processing.

Floyd's usage of 'reversible process' applies directly to image processing. You would understand this if you had had any training in a relevant subject. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Sandman (8h & 40m)