Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/22/2014 00:08 (09/22/2014 10:08) |
Message-ID | <f1ju1ad55jnmcbf58u8t8jvttl94othufv@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (9h & 9m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanThey are not facts. You just think they are. It's what lies behind these 'facts' which is important. --
In article <6k2s1alb96g131bbn9kt9b34ns3g5v8ku4@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:Sandman1. HPS is, in the example, a pixel-altering process. 2. JPG compression is a pixel-altering process 3. Gaussian blur is a pixel-altering process.3 can *NOT* reverse 1 with 2 in the middle. It is impossible. It can *counteract* it and the end result may be satisfactory, but number 1 has *NOT* been reversed. Pixels have been altered in the interrim that 3 can not take into account.Eric Stevens
You haven't understood my diagram above. Once I would have tried to explain it to you but now I know there is no point.
Typical Eric, can't really respond to the facts above so he dances his little dance while saying nothing.