Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromEric Stevens
Date09/22/2014 00:08 (09/22/2014 10:08)
Message-ID<f1ju1ad55jnmcbf58u8t8jvttl94othufv@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (9h & 9m) > Eric Stevens

On 21 Sep 2014 10:30:37 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <6k2s1alb96g131bbn9kt9b34ns3g5v8ku4@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

1. HPS is, in the example, a pixel-altering process. 2. JPG compression is a pixel-altering process 3. Gaussian blur is a pixel-altering process.

3 can *NOT* reverse 1 with 2 in the middle. It is impossible. It can *counteract* it and the end result may be satisfactory, but number 1 has *NOT* been reversed. Pixels have been altered in the interrim that 3 can not take into account.

Eric Stevens
You haven't understood my diagram above. Once I would have tried to explain it to you but now I know there is no point.

Sandman
Typical Eric, can't really respond to the facts above so he dances his little dance while saying nothing.

They are not facts. You just think they are. It's what lies behind these 'facts' which is important. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens