Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | PeterN |
Date | 09/19/2014 15:26 (09/19/2014 09:26) |
Message-ID | <lvharh060h@news4.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | nospam (3h & 24m) > PeterN |
Eric StevensBut you sould know that nosense knows much more than Dan Margulies.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:17:42 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamEric Stevens
In article <2014091811153644303-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:nospamPeterNSavageduck
I have found that using high pass on the luminiscence layer in LAB tends to minimize halos.
Actually it is a good idea to do any/all/most sharpening on a luminosity layer, LAB or not.
not always, since the conversion to lab and back is not lossless.
Not strictly correct:
https://www.ledet.com/margulis/ACT_postings/ColorCorrection/ACT-LAB-damage.htm
">I have always thought that moving from either CMYK or RGB to LabnospamEric Stevens
and back was a damage free process, that is, you would end up with the same color co-ordinates when you arrived back from Lab mode.
"RGB>LAB>RGB is damage free, but CMYK>LAB>CMYK is not. The damage isn't all that great, so in many images it pays to come out of CMYK so as to take advantage of LAB's strengths; sharpening, however, is not one of these cases. .... Dan Margulis"