Eric Stevens
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:07:04 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:

Savageduck
On 2014-09-20 23:39:49 +0000, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>said:

nospam
In article <t03s1atqlub50ec92bu1u73pra4ettn4th@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Sandman
Nothing in your reply makes image processing be the same as thermodynamics, Eric. You're blathering about things you know nothing about.

Eric Stevens
See http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e

Sandman
You failed again. Are you jusyt wildly googling and hoping that something will support your incorrect claims? Seems that way.

Eric Stevens
"Maximum entropy method in image processing".

Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.

nospam
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.

Savageduck
Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. <http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html>

Eric Stevens
And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding".