Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 10/01/2014 00:07 (10/01/2014 11:07) |
Message-ID | <8aam2apa0r82mtv6gbfa9tf87ugm81tio1@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (9m) PeterN (2h & 20m) |
nospamFrom what I have read, I suspect the actual colour working space inside Photoshop may have changed somewhere about CS2. That *would* affect the transforms in and out of that space.
In article <m0c13t09k1@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:nospamPeterNnospamPeterNnospamPeterNPeterNnospam
I forgot to mention the age of the article,
no you didn't.
Show me where
one cannot prove a negative.
IOW. You made another unprovable statement. I said that I did not mention hte dae of an articel. YOu said I did. I asked where. The only thing unprovable is the truth of your statement.
i said you didn't *forget*, not that it matters since the date is completely irrelevant and you know it. it's nothing more than a diversion because you are completely full of shit.
If it doesn't matter, why do you bring it up.
you're the one who brought it up.
you're trying to claim that somehow the math for the rgb->lab transform has somehow changed in the time the article has been written. that's absurd. it hasn't. only an idiot would make that claim.
--PeterNnospam
Once again your use of a pejortive proves you are sick and have a need to keep arguing. this link may help you.
<http://www.psych.org/>
take your own advice. you're the one who drops the first pejoratives.