Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/22/2014 22:13 (09/23/2014 08:13) |
Message-ID | <vi012a998occ3qefc4am4lve3vdm7tcq4m@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Savageduck (1h & 55m) > Eric Stevens Sandman (16h & 22m) |
SandmanThere should be some nett merit in talking to you but I'm fraid there isn't. This time when you go down you will stay down.
In article <l6ju1ap2gt4oarggc5a0jh0n8irdeml5li@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanEric StevensEric StevensSandman
No, quite correct. See, for example: http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e
Again, thermodynamics have nothing to do with image processing.
A *lot* of people don't agree with you.
Incorrect.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothibng to with with image processing.Eric StevensSandman
http://www.johnloomis.org/ece563/notes/basics/entropy/entropy.html "In the case of an image ... "
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothing to do with image processingEric StevensSandman
http://brainacle.com/calculating-image-entropy-with-python-how-and-why.html
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothing to do with using maximum entropy in image processing.Eric StevensSandman
http://www.esrf.eu/computing/Forum/imgCIF/PAPER/entropy.html
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothing to do with image processing.Eric StevensSandman
http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles0808/ip0808-1.html
First link that quotes the second law of thermodynamics, but alas - it has nothing to do with neither image processing or using maximum entropy in image processing. This is a text about artistically interesting images based on their percieved entropy.Eric StevensSandman
You can carry on from there.
My god, this was the hardest you've ever failed thus far. You have to stop google-linking stuff you haven't looked at yourself even.
This is what happens when you spout off about things you know nothing about, you're reduced to google like crazy to try to find *something* that may related to what you think you're saying.SandmanEric StevensSandmanYou're flailing, Eric.Eric Stevens
And you are way out of your depth.
Ironic.
Like an anchor.
Indeed. There is no way to recover from this, I'm afraid. You'll forever be the clueless moron that has to comment on things he knows nothing about. I won't claim you had any credibility before this, because you didn't, but you sure went the extra mile to make sure no one ever mistakes you for having it.