Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/16/2014 04:08 (09/15/2014 22:08) |
| Message-ID | <150920142208254349%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (47m) > nospam |
In article <6t5f1a9iott62bbr6tbbugdthsvt6nq46u@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
floyd would be the one who has only learned one of them.nospamEric Stevens
when a user can modify an image and change it later, it's reversible and that's why it's called a non-destructive workflow.
Fine, fine. If you wear a reversible jacket do call it, too, a non-destructive work flow?
Of course not. There are several subtly different meanings to the word 'reversible' and you seem to have only learned one of them.
everything in a non-destructive workflow is reversible. that's the whole *point* and why it's so useful.
09/13/2014-
