Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/20/2014 02:54 (09/20/2014 12:54) |
Message-ID | <69jp1adfm872bdd91ot20kgl7lfavflok8@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Floyd L. Davidson (37m) Sandman (10h & 14m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanUnfortunately he knows too much, compared with the rest of us. I did wonder when he threw in that JPEG conversion but I finally he concluded that he was trying to make a point.
In article <na4n1a9tqb8cr0bcsqju244pdvkiui43g8@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:Eric StevensCorrection:
He never claimed that the JPG can be reversed. As I have already written, he said that the original image can be recovered after sharpening by HPS even after the image has been saved as a JPG.He never claimed that the JPG can be reversed.Sandman
Correction:
He did.Eric StevensSandman
As I have already written, he said that the sharpening of the original image can be recovered after sharpening by HPS even after the image has been saved as a JPG.
Which requires that the JPG compression is reversed as well. Floyd didn't realize this because he doesn't know how these things work.